myLot Discussions| statistical comparison between US higher education and religious people | | now, this ofcourse isnt solid, but its funny how, according to census.gov, in 2002, about 12% of Americans have gained higher education. Coincidentally, 10% of Americans in the same year considered themselves not to be apart of any religious grouping. now, im not one to jump to conclusions, but too bad there isnt a pole that checks religion and education at the same time.. or else I would think it would be close to a 2% minority of educated religious people. so, could it be that 2% of educated religious people are representing 90% of undereducated religious people against the 10% secular and educated group?ofcourse, this isnt a very good question to ask as we cant really know if the educated people are all secular.. for all we know, all 12% could be religious (haha).. but my question is, do you think that there is a comparison between religious people and education?why are the numbers for education and for secularist groups so close?PS: mind you that out of the 90% of religious people, 78% of them are christian (protestant + catholic) and out of that population, 60% believe that the bible is the "word of god." PPS: also, a big error margin may be that these... | |
| | what is an statistical survey | | An staistical survey is atype of surevy queationnaire that are used to collect quatitaive information about items in a polpulation. Surveys of human populations and institutions are common in political polling and government health, social science and marketing research. A survey may focus on opinions or factual information depending on its purpose, and many surveys involve administering questions to individuals. When the questions are administerd by a researcher, the survey is called a structured interview.. when the questions are administerd by the respondent the survey is referred as a qusertionnaire. | |
| | Collection of Data as statistical investigation | | Collection of data consistitutes the first step in statistical investigation.It is only on the data collected
that the super structure of statistical analysis and decision making is built.
If the data collected are reliable,correct decisions can be
taken,otherwise one may reach to the conclusions which may
mislead.
Before starting the work of data collection the investigator has to carry out preliminary analysis of the problem in question. | |
| | | | | wanted help in statistical analysis | | Hi
I am doing my ph.d in botany and would like if some one could help with the analysis of my data. someone with minitab based in Bangalore, India . my email is getsaju@gmail.com | |
| | facts and figures about any commercial companies for statistical analysis | | their annual revenue,turnover,profit,loss,growth rate,diversification,expansion,mergers,new acquisition,quartely revenue,cost of production,capital,financial position,market share etc | |
| | Global warming effects on our Future Generations | | Yes it is true my dear friends. The greehouse effect is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by gases in the atmosphere. Global warming may be detected in natural, ecological or social systems as a change having statistical significance. Changes in regional climate ae expected to include greater warmin over land, with most warming at high northern latitudes.
Global warming have many disadvantages which are highly effected to our FUTURE GENERATIONS. SO MY DEAR FRIEND, WE HAVE TO REDUCE THE POLLUTION. please SEND ME your openions and suggestions, I cardially wishes the response from you........ | |
| | 10 things the internet has ruined | | http://www.cio.com/article/591042/10_Things_the_Internet_has_Ruined_and_Five_Things_it_Hasn_tHere are ten things the Net is making virtually extinct, plus five that have flourished.1. Trust in EncyclopediasWhen I was a kid, if something was in the Encyclopedia Britannica (or even Grolier's), it was true. Now--thanks to Wikipedia--having "encyclopedic knowledge" of a topic isn't as impressive when there's a good chance most of what you think you know was concocted by a 12-year-old. After a 2005 study by the British journal Nature showed Britannica and Wikipedia to be equally inaccurate, faith in all encyclopedias plummeted. Britannica attacked that study's methodology as "fatally flawed," but it was too late.Also dead: trust in studies of encyclopedias.2. Barroom ArgumentsIt used to be you could kill many hours and even more brain cells drinking beer and arguing over arcane trivia. Who was a more fearsome slugger, Babe Ruth or Hank Aaron? Who'd win a one-on-one match between Kobe Bryant and Doctor J? (Sorry Kobe--we love ya man, but in 1972 the Doc was unstoppable.) Now whenever there's a question of fact, somebody just whips out a smartphone and does a... | |
| | |
|
